|
Sampling Behavior
n The extent to which observations may be generalized (external validity) depends on how behavior is sampled.
n Two
methods are time sampling and situation sampling.
n Researchers
typically use a combination of both methods.
n The
goal of both methods is to obtain a representative sample of behavior.
Sampling Behavior (continued)
n Time
Sampling: Researchers choose time intervals for making
observations.
n Systematic:
Schedule observations to occur at a regular time (e.g., first day of the week, each noon).
n Random:
Use some random means for identifying times for observations.
n Time
sampling is not used when researchers wish to observe rare events (e.g., behavior following a hurricane).
n Event
sampling is used for rare events (for example, the
researcher travels to the site of a recent hurricane).
Sampling Behavior, continued
n Situation
Sampling: Researchers choose different settings,
circumstances, and conditions for their observations.
n Situation
sampling enhances the external validity of findings.
n Within
situations, researchers may use subject sampling to observe some people in the setting (e.g., choose every 5th person
to enter a store).
Classification of Observational
Methods
n Two
categories of observational methods:
n Observation
without Intervention
n Observation
with Intervention
n Observational
methods can also be classified according to the methods for recording behavior.
n Comprehensive
record of behavior
n Selected
behaviors
Observation without Intervention
n Naturalistic
Observation: Observation in natural (“real-world”)
settings without an attempt to intervene or change the situation.
n Goals:
Describe behavior as it normally occurs, examine relationships among naturally occurring variables.
n Naturalistic
observation helps to establish the external validity of laboratory findings.
n Naturalistic
observation is used when ethical and moral considerations prevent experimental manipulation.
Observation with Intervention
n Most
psychological research involves observation with intervention.
n Researchers
typically choose from three methods of observation with intervention in natural settings:
n Participant
observation
n Structured
observation
n Field experiment
Observation with Intervention
(continued)
n Participant
Observation: Observer is an active participant in
the natural setting he or she observes.
n undisguised: people in the setting know they are being observed
n disguised: people don’t know they are being observed
n
n Disguised
participant observation helps control for reactivity, one of the main problems associated with observation.
n Reactivity occurs when people change their usual behavior because they know they are being observed.
n Participant
observers may sometimes lose their objectivity by becoming too involved in the situation.
n Participant
observers may influence the behavior of people they are observing.
Observation with Intervention
(continued)
n Structured
Observation: Researcher sets up (structures) a specific
situation in order to observe people’s behavior.
n Examples:
clinical and developmental observations of behavior,
psychological testing
n Structured
observation is useful when behavior is difficult to observe as it naturally occurs.
n Researchers
often use confederates to create the structured situation.
n Problems
occur when observers don’t follow the same procedures across observations or observers, and when important variables
are not controlled.
n Field
Experiment: Researcher manipulates an independent
variable in a natural setting and observes behavior (dependent variable).
n There
must be two or more conditions to compare (independent variable).
n Researchers
often use confederates to create these different conditions.
n Researchers
attempt to have the most control in field experiments.
Recording Behavior
n Researchers
can obtain a comprehensive record of people’s behavior (e.g., video tapes) or select specific behaviors
to record.
n The
method for recording behavior determines how the results of the study are eventually measured, summarized, analyzed, and reported.
n Qualitative
Records
n Researchers
use narrative records when they want a complete (comprehensive) reproduction of people’s behavior.
n Examples: videotapes, audiotapes, field notes
n Narrative
records should be made during or soon after behavior is observed.
n Observers
must be carefully trained.
n Advantage:
Can review the record often to observe behavior.
n Disadvantage:
Costly, time-consuming.
n Quantitative
Records
n Selected
Behaviors: Researchers choose the behavior they want
to observe and ignore other behaviors.
n Researchers
need to decide how they will measure the behavior.
n Examples: frequency of behavior,
duration
n Recording
techniques include checklists and electronic recording and tracking.
Analyzing Observational Data
n Reliability: Reliability refers to consistency.
n We
need to know whether two or more observers agree (are consistent) in their observations.
n This
is called interobserver reliability.
n Factors
that affect interobserver reliability:
n characteristics
of the observers
bored, amount of experience, looking at
different things (what you and I consider to be “effective” may differ)
Researchers need to train their observers
and provide feedback about errors and discrepancies.
n events
and behaviors to be observed and recorded are not clearly defined
The researcher needs to be clear to both
observers as to what she means by “effective.”
It’s best to provide examples.
|